The exploration of information should go beyond the newspapers and articles. Yes, we are talking about the carbon offset schemes. Some criticism about the projects have come up due to unfounded reasons. While newspapers and anchors, find it hard to match up their intentions with the actual work done by researchers and consultants around the world, the results showcase how carbon markets have been doing well in the last decade.
Of course, rounding it off about the benefits of carbon offset project would rather give a potential answer for halting the juggernaut of all kinds of speculations. We will try to answer our best in the following.
The oil and gas operators are held responsible for increasing global emissions, which is not practically untrue. Despite replacing coal with natural, there has been no significant reduction in the emissions and neither has it benefited in improving environmental performance. It triggers the need for a “strategy”, “planning”, and “orderly implementation” with the help of a consultant.
With the help of the strategy consultants, the operators will find it smooth to invest in the carbon markets. In fact, the overall execution depends on the sophisticated techniques of reducing methane emissions in the oil and gas sector. Additionally, the projects undertaken will produce high-end results, such as reducing the carbon intensity of transportation fuels. Clearly, dissecting available information from variable sources makes a direct impact than following up the gross information spread by misleading articles.
|